Trump argues that the Jan. 6 committee could harm the president in its search for records

Trump is appealing against a lower court’s decision to submit his records to the committee. The Biden administration and the U.S. House of Representatives are united in opposing the former president’s attempt to keep the record secret, arguing that 70,000 pages, including White House call logs and notes from his top advisers, should be available for investigation.

The federal appeals court will hear oral arguments on the historic issue on November 30.

“Apparently, the appetite of President Trump for the appellants is leading them to the path of permanent damage to the presidency,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in a brief summary of their response to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday.

“The current president cannot destroy the confidentiality of executive branch communications and the critical dependence attached to that privacy for his own political advantage to the detriment of his predecessors and successors,” he continued.

Biden administration Refusal to claim executive privileges On the record, Trump argues that this means future presidents may decide to disregard privacy in the White House if their predecessors are from different political parties.
The Biden administration has done He argued that all the documents were there Trump is trying to keep it secret, historical records will eventually be made public under the national archives approach, and even if some documents are found to be privileged, the White House believes there will be an “extraordinary” need for transparency when it comes to January. 6.
Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan of the lower court Decided against Trump Earlier this month, he said there was no power to override the current administration’s decisions.

Trump, now debating his case in the appellate court, must win the case and block the House committee as a way to protect “constitutional security” and the executive’s prerogative of the president. He then asks the court to look at the documents from his presidential page to determine what should be safe – an approach that will drag document production into many months or years.

Trump’s attorneys wrote Wednesday that “a specific analysis of whether each record is correctly productive must be documented-by-document, and not from the scattergun approach advocated by the appellate and district courts,” Trump’s attorneys wrote Wednesday.

The three-judge appellate committee hearing the case is already questioning that view. After receiving written legal briefs of the first phase in the case, he asked on Tuesday if the concerned lawyers could address in the course of their oral argument the question of whether the court has the capacity to go into the dispute.


Google News Follow 1
Trump argues that the Jan. 6 committee could harm the president in its search for records 2

Leave a Reply