This is a turning point in the epidemic. Much of the year’s anxiety and confusion transforms our relationship into a mask, which has gone far beyond stopping aerosolic secretions. The mask mandate is being removed across the country as a case of COVID-1 pl plume. The overall threat of this giant epidemic suddenly feels like a blip on the national radar, thanks to a huge vaccination campaign and a deep desire to talk about anything at all. When the CDC Advised People who were vaccinated two weeks ago did not need to wear masks, inside or outside the home, the change around New York City was almost rapid. National, move Related to A collision in vaccine demand.
For some, it can be scary, even frightening – especially for those who have not been vaccinated, who have life-threatening post-traumatic stress disorder with COVID-1, or who have a high risk of complications. The epidemic is not over, and in the past year experts have repeatedly seen that masks save lives. Wear a mask. Wear a mask. Wear a mask. In public, it is not known who was vaccinated. There is a lot of business Selected to continue Masks are needed indoors, while others No.
It is true, from a purely scientific point of view, that people were vaccinated I don’t think so Make a meaningful risk to others or yourself, if they leave the mask. We haven’t seen a serious scary number Success cases, And carved persons I don’t think so To serve as Asymptomatic spreaders Of the disease. But the real tension exists between mask science and mask guidelines. From Guidelines In this context, having different rules for vaccinated and undivided people creates a minefield for public places, businesses, and other organizations where employees who are not vaccinated and who should not be left out. A school system may be able to verify the immune status of its students and faculty, but it may not be able to sort out everyone who comes through the door of a restaurant or grocery store.
This has led to heated debates and an inflammatory tendency to blame. Is the CDC too vague, too progressive, or simply careless in its advice? Should the local government act with clear instructions? Will businesses make their own decisions and enforce the rules they choose? Are there responsibilities in those decisions? Are we looking for definite answers that don’t exist?
This difference between science and guidelines is not new; It is a constant source of friction in public health. Take for example the recommendations we use 1 150 minutes One week, or that man limits himself Two alcoholic beverages One day These numbers are not divinely ordained. Exercise for an hour every day Even better For our health, such as drinking alcohol in one or zero drinks instead of two is prohibited. But the guidelines are really about considering the practical and actionable in the global context, as opposed to the pure order of ideal physiology or toxicology. If you advise people that tattooing is the only true way, or if they need to spend every day in the gym, they will hold their hand and don’t.